Back to projects

Salesforce Product

Project Roadmap Workspace

A Salesforce-native project roadmap workspace concept with board, list, and Gantt-style planning views, saved views, milestones, tasks, side-panel editing, governance rules, archive handling, and export workflows.

Case Study Draft 2025-2026

Problem

Teams needed a clearer way to manage roadmap items, milestones, tasks, saved views, and delivery state inside a Salesforce-native workspace.

Solution

Designed a workspace pattern with multiple planning views, side-panel editing, saved view behavior, archive handling, settings, help content, and export-oriented workflows.

Impact Direction

  • Created a clearer product surface for roadmap planning and execution.
  • Connected project delivery concepts to Salesforce-native data and access patterns.
  • Established a foundation for admin-friendly configuration and iterative feature growth.

Role

Product Builder Business Analyst Project Manager Developer

Technologies

Apex LWC SOQL JavaScript Salesforce Custom Objects Permission-Aware Services

Capabilities Demonstrated

Product UX Salesforce Custom Object Design Business Analysis Project Management Salesforce Development AI-Assisted Delivery

Overview

Project Roadmap Workspace is a Salesforce-native product concept for managing roadmap items, milestones, tasks, saved views, and planning states from a dedicated workspace. The goal is to give project and product work a clearer operating surface inside Salesforce instead of scattering planning context across disconnected tools.

The product direction combines business analysis, project management, product UX, Salesforce custom object design, Apex service patterns, Lightning Web Components, governance rules, and AI-assisted iteration.

Problem

Roadmap and delivery work can become difficult to manage when project context is split across objects, spreadsheets, notes, and status conversations. Teams need a way to see what is planned, what is in progress, what is blocked, what has been archived, and what needs attention next.

The challenge was to design a Salesforce-native workspace that could support multiple planning views while still respecting data structure, permissions, governance, and maintainability.

Solution

The solution is a workspace pattern with board, list, and Gantt-style planning views backed by Salesforce data and Apex service layers.

The experience is designed around several core workflows:

  • View roadmap items by status, timing, ownership, or delivery grouping.
  • Switch between board, list, and timeline-oriented planning modes.
  • Open a side panel to review and edit item details without losing the workspace context.
  • Manage milestones and related tasks as part of the same planning surface.
  • Save useful views for repeated planning and review.
  • Archive or unarchive items without losing historical context.
  • Apply governance rules so status changes and editing behavior stay consistent.
  • Export or summarize roadmap data when needed for planning conversations.

Key Capabilities

  • Board, list, and Gantt-style views
  • Saved views
  • Side-panel editing
  • Roadmap item details
  • Milestones and tasks
  • Archive and unarchive behavior
  • Status governance
  • Settings and density modes
  • Help content
  • Export-oriented workflow concepts

Architecture / Technical Approach

The technical approach separates workspace state, server-side operations, security checks, and Salesforce data relationships.

Workspace LWC
  -> manages view state, filters, saved views, side panel, density, and interactions
Apex Controller
  -> exposes UI-safe endpoints for workspace data and mutations
Roadmap Service
  -> coordinates data retrieval, save operations, response DTOs, and business rules
Security Service
  -> centralizes access checks and permission-aware behavior
Salesforce Data Layer
  -> Project, Roadmap Item, Project Task, Team, Saved View, and configuration concepts

This separation keeps the UI focused on interaction while Apex services handle business logic, data shaping, and permission-aware behavior. The pattern also gives future features a clearer place to live instead of concentrating every decision in the component layer.

User Experience Decisions

The UX is designed for repeated planning work, not a one-time form submission. Users need to scan, compare, edit, and return to useful views quickly.

Important UX decisions include:

  • Provide multiple views because roadmap planning is not always best represented by one layout.
  • Use a side panel so edits do not force users away from the workspace.
  • Keep saved views available for recurring planning conversations.
  • Include archive behavior so completed or paused work can move out of the main view without disappearing.
  • Support density modes so users can choose between scanning more items and reading more detail.
  • Include help content for governance rules and workspace behavior.

Impact Direction

The expected value is a clearer, more maintainable planning experience rather than an unverified numeric claim.

  • Creates a focused workspace for roadmap planning and execution.
  • Connects project delivery concepts to Salesforce-native data and access patterns.
  • Reduces scattered planning context by bringing related items, tasks, and views into one surface.
  • Establishes a foundation for admin-friendly configuration and iterative product growth.

My Role

My role spans product builder, business analyst, project manager, and developer responsibilities:

  • Translate roadmap planning needs into product requirements and release slices.
  • Design the workspace UX, object relationships, and component structure.
  • Shape Apex controller and service responsibilities.
  • Think through governance, permissions, archive behavior, and saved views.
  • Use AI-assisted workflows for requirement drafting, UX iteration, technical planning, documentation, and review while preserving human judgment around architecture and maintainability.

Technology Stack

  • Lightning Web Components
  • Apex
  • SOQL
  • JavaScript
  • Salesforce custom objects
  • Permission-aware service patterns
  • Saved view and configuration concepts
  • Export workflow concepts

Confidentiality Note

This case study avoids confidential company, customer, and system details. It does not include internal object names beyond generic public-safe examples, private records, proprietary screenshots, URLs, credentials, or org-specific identifiers. Future visuals should be sanitized mockups or approved public-safe screenshots.